Marty and Karla Grant

The Genealogy of Marty Grant and wife Karla Mangus Grant.

Share Print Bookmark

Notes


Matches 84,601 to 84,650 of 88,443

      «Prev «1 ... 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 ... 1769» Next»

 #   Notes   Linked to 
84601 !NOTES:This may be same person as Benjamin Martin Wright s/o George. Though if so he was listed twice in 1850. I'm 75% they are one and the same, but not proven;

!CENSUS:1840;

!CENSUS:1850 Buncombe Co., NC PHF 269-991-992
Solomon Hampton 31 M Farmer 400 NC
Sarah 30 F “
Elvina Tompson 7 F “
Martin Wright 13 M “

!CENSUS:1860 x 		Wright, Martin (I80718)
 
84602 !NOTES:This may be Williams Wright (1775) of Surry Co., NC;

!CENSUS:1790;

!CENSUS:1800 x no Wrights in Iredell;

!NAMED-WILL:29 May 1803 Iredell Co., NC Wills I-149 29 May 1803 Andrew Mitchell, proven 19 Nov 1805. Wife Sarah ... daughters Lillis; *Sally Wright* ... Martha ... Mary ... Cinthey ... Sons Andrew ... Samuel ... James .... Executors Wife and sons *William Wright* and Samuel Mitchell. Witnesses: William Tharpe and P. Houston.

!CENSUS:1810 x no Wrights in Iredell; 		Wright, William (I81491)
 
84603 !NOTES:This might be Caroline's son from a previous marriage.
I found this family in 1850 who could be them:
# 358/358
Isaac H. Hatcher 35 Laborer $- SC
Caroline 27
Charles 5
Tillman 3


!CENSUS:1850;


!CENSUS:1860 Marlboro Dist., SC Bennettsville PO # 961/961
Wm Turner 24 Farmer $-/50 SC
Caroline 32
Charles 15
Elmira 8
* Next to Isham Turner 55; 		Turner, Charles (I111624)
 
84604 !NOTES:This might be Frances Stuart d/o Daniel Stuart. They were 7th District in 1860;


!CENSUS:1860;
!CENSUS:1870;


!CENSUS:1880 Polk Co., TN 7th Civil District # 139/139
Franky Stuart 28 S Farming TN-TN-TN
Rindie 12 dau at home TN-TN-TN
Tolbert 6 son
* A few houses from Fannice Stuart 22 SC-SC-SC 		Stuart, Franky (I120339)
 
84605 !NOTES:This might be John S. Wright (bef 1755 or 1760/70) of Stokes;

!CENSUS:1790;

!CENSUS:1800;

!MARRIAGE BOND: 7 May 1805 Stokes Co., NC John Wright & Nancy Johnson, Benj Forsyth, bm

!CENSUS:1810 x 		Wright, John (I81015)
 
84606 !NOTES:This might be Nicholas Grindstaff (c1740's) who died in the 1780's or 1790's in Carter Co., TN. Many researchers show his wife to be "Catherine Smith" so that fits. No documentation on him so far though.;


!TAXLIST:1787 Washington Co., TN
Nicholas Grindstaff 100a, 1 pole
Michael Grindstaff 100a 1 pole
Jacob Grindstaff 1 pole
Isaac Grindstaff 200a 1 pole
* From a posting by Margaret Wagner Lewis at Genforum:
http://genforum.genealogy.com/grindstaff/messages/752.html


!TAXLIST:1788 Washington Co., TN
Richard White's Company
Michael Grindstaff 0a
Jacob Grindstaff 0a
Nicholas Grindstaff 100a
* From a posting by Margaret Wagner Lewis at Genforum:
http://genforum.genealogy.com/grindstaff/messages/811.html 		Grindstaff (I7937)
 
84607 !NOTES:This might be same person as Benjamin J. Lane (c1796) of Houston Co., GA;

!DEED:16 Dec 1820 Wayne Co., NC DB 12 page 211
Division of lands of John Lane deceased to heirs:
James Lane
William Lane
Bryant Lane
Benjamin Lane
Wilie Lane
Sanders (Saunders) Lane
Smitha Lane
From ;

!DEED: 3 Sep 1821 Wayne Co., NC Deed Book 15 page 84
Benjamin Lane to William Lane.
From ;

!NAMED-DEED: 8 Mar 1822 Wayne Co., NC Deed Book 12 page 310
Briant Lane deed of gift to daughter Peggy White.
Witness: Benjamin Lane
From ;

!NAMED-DEED:24 Feb 1830 Wayne Co., NC Deed Book 15 page 270
William Lane to Benjamin Bynum, land from John Lane deceased to Benjamin Lane, then to William Lane son of said John Lane
From ;

!NAMED-DEED:24 Feb 1830 Wayne Co., NC Deed Book 15 page 271
Edith Lane to Benjamin Bynum her interest in land to Benjamin Lane from her husband John Lane deceased
From ; 		Lane, Benjamin (I99568)
 
84608 !NOTES:This might be son of Robert Moody Sr instead of the James I currently have assigned to him (who is older than this one);


!NOTES:Much family data including some death dates in Equity Roll # 376;


!CENSUS:1790;


!CENSUS:1800;


!CENSUS:1810;


!CENSUS:1820 Marion Dist., SC p. 20
James Moody Jr age 26-44 (1775/94)
200010-10010
Slaves=0000-2010


!CENSUS:1830 Marion Dist., SC p. 33
James Moody age 40-49 (1780/90)
0010001-2210001
Slaves 510100-511100


!CENSUS:1840 Marion Dist., SC p. 165
James Moody age 40-49 (1790/1800)
2200001-0113001
Slaves=201000-151010;


!CENSUS:1850 Marion Dist, SC # 1753/1759
James Moody 65 farmer $ 5000 Marion
Jennet 45
Caroline 21
George 18 farmer
Sofiah 17
John 16 farmer
William 13
Edmund 12
Reese 10
Robert 8
Oliver 6;


!PROBATE ROLL # 591 James Moody
Will 9 Jun 1849
dau Mary McDaniel
dau Eliza Williams
single dau Caroline
single dau Sophia
wife (not named)
sons (not named)
daughters
Mary McDaniel
Elenor Wilkins
Eliza Williams
Martha Bigham
Caroline Moody
Sophia Moody
Wm T. Wilson, exec.
Wit: Robert Napier, Saml. A. Lane, Thos M. Lane.
Proven 19 Aug 1851.
George Moody overseer 1851
John Moody overseer 1853; 		Moody, James (I13431)
 
84609 !NOTES:This might be the Bryant Lane s/o John & Edith, but since there were several Bryants who match age-wise, I can't be sure;

!CENSUS:1810;

!CENSUS:1820;

!CENSUS:1830 Houston Co., GA pg 285 Bryant Lane age 20-29 (1800/10)
10001-10001;

!CENSUS:1840 Houston Co., GA pg 385 Bryant Lane Jr age 30-39 (1800/10)
222001-010001;

!CENSUS:1850 Houston Co., GA Lower 11th Dist # 762/762
Bryant Lane 48 Farmer $5700 NC
Sarah 47
William 22 Farmer GA
Deborah 20
Raiford 16 Farmer
Thomas 14
Stephen 12
Sarah 8
John 5
Eliza Wall 17;

!CENSUS:1860 x 		Lane, Bryant (I99503)
 
84610 !NOTES:This might be the one who married Sarah Barnes in 1796; Barnes, Brinsley (I121236)
 
84611 !NOTES:This might be the same Ephraim who had a wife Sarah in 1752, but his 1781 Will only says "my two children" and one of those is proven Nancy born ca 1781. No way her mother is same Sarah from 1752. Could be same Ephraim, two wives named Sarah, or two different Ephraim;


!WILL:18 Sep 1781 Granville Co., NC
Ephraim Estridge of Granville
to my wife Sarah
my two children (not named, but mentions them needing to be raised, so probably minors).
Executors: Joseph McDonald & Zacharias Higgs
S: Ephraim (X) Estridge
W: James McDonald
W: John Estridge
Proven May 1784 		Eastridge, Ephraim (I26995)
 
84612 !NOTES:This might be the same Joseph in 1790 & 1800 Mecklenburg. Not found in 1810 or 1820;

!CENSUS:1790;

!CENSUS:1800; 		Stewart, Joseph (I17242)
 
84613 !NOTES:This might be the same person as Robert C. Collins (20 Feb 1857 - 26 Oct 1934) of Robeson Co., NC. The name and age match, however, Robert of Robeson was listed as Indian or Mulatto on the 1900 through 1930 census records, and on birth records as well as his obituary. Is it the same man as the son of Sheriff Robert Collins of Marion?;


!CENSUS:1860 Marion Dist, SC # 272 R.C. COLLINS, 2 (1857/58) born SC;


!CENSUS:1870 Marion Co., SC Marion Township, Marion CH PO # 423/442
Robert Collins 41 Sherriff of Marion County $6000/3463 SC
Elizabeth 45 Keeping House
Abie 15 f At home
Robert Charley 13
Elizabeth 11
Albert S. J. 9
Laura G. 7
John Walter 13;


!CENSUS:1880 Marion Co., SC Reaves # 97/97
Robt Collins, 51 M Farmer SC-SC-SC
Elisabeth, 58 wife NC-NC-NC
Robt C. 22 son Laborer SC-SC-NC
Elizabeth, 19 dau Laborer
Albert S. J. 16 son Laborer
Laura, 15 dau Laborer; 		Collins, Robert Charles (I43480)
 
84614 !NOTES:This name and her dates are from FamilySearch.org. I don't know the sources; Waddle, Mary (I120538)
 
84615 !NOTES:This name was mistaken for Cathey on some records, but is actually Calfee, alias Calfey, etc.

I've gathered some data on them just for self defence purposes. It's not verified by me; 		Calfee (I117332)
 
84616 !NOTES:This name was mistaken for Cathey on some records, but is actually Carthrae (various spellings)

I've gathered some data on them just for self defence purposes. It's not verified by me; 		Carthrae (I117344)
 
84617 !NOTES:This person is *possibly* my 6x Great Aunt;


!REFERENCE:
https://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/naill/default.html


!NOTES:I think it's most likely that Lettice and Agnes are children of either Samuel Neill or his brother Alexander Neill (d 1785).


!NOTES:Her findagrave.com entry lists her information as
Letitia Neil Kell
b 6 Mar 1762 Carlisle, Cumberland Co., PA
d: 1803 Pendleton,Anderson County, SC
burial ---
Parents William Neil and Elizabeth J. Snodgrass
No documentation included.
I haven't found anything on such a couple yet;


!NOTES:Three houses from Andrew Bryson (wife Agness Naill) on 1790 census Pendleton Dist., SC;


!MARRIAGE BOND:30 Aug 1783 Rowan Co., NC
James Kell & Lettice Kneal
James Faries, bm; 		Neill, Lettice (I126702)
 
84618 !NOTES:This person is *possibly* my 7x Great Grandfather
- As of now (2/22/2026) I have Samuel assigned as father to Lettice Neill (wife of James Kell) and Agnes Neill (wife of Andrew Bryson) primarily because Samuel was bondsman for Agnes's marriage, and they don't fit anywhere else, though it's possible they could be daughters of Alexander. Lettice did name a son Alexander;


!REFERENCE:
https://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/naill/default.html


!NAMED-LAND ENTRY:24 Feb 1778 Rowan Co., NC
David Ramsy enters 50 acres (# 480) adj Robert Ramsy, William Kelton and Saml Neals claims.


!NAMED-LAND ENTRY:14 Aug 1778 Rowan Co., NC
William Erwin enters 320 acres (# 1389) head branches of Davidsons Creek ... both side s of old road leading from Salisbury to Oliphants Mill beg. at Samuel Neel's conditional corner ... John Templeton's old line.
* Note that William Bryson also lived on the road from Oliphants Mill .


!LAND ENTRY:14 Dec 1778 Rowan Co., NC
Samuel Neal enters 200 acres (# 1826) on Fall's Creek joining Robert Ramsey, David Ramsey, William Erwin, James Patterson and Archabald McCAravey


!LAND ENTRY:14 Mar 1779 Rowan Co., NC Book 75, p. 280
Samuel Neill, 230 acres on Halls Creek joining Robert Ramsey, David Ramsey, William Erwin, James Patterson & Archibald McCravey.
Surveyed 13 Feb 1790 228 1/2 acres on Halls Creek ... same adjoining as in entry.
Patk. Grimes and Jno McNeeley, chain bearers.
Granted 20 Dec 1791 # 2142, File 2681


!NAMED-LAND GRANT:21 Mar 1780 Rowan Co., NC
to William Erwin 372 acres on head waters of Davidson Creek
corner said Erwin, Samuel Neal & Archibald McCavey ...


!BONDSMAN-MARRIAGE BOND:17 Dec 1783 Rowan Co., NC
Andy Brison* & Agnes Naill
---, bm illegible**
* Signed Andrew Bryson
** For the transcribed book, the author translated bondsman as James Naill
** For the handwritten Rowan Co., NC marriage register, the clerk translated name as Sam. Naill
** In "The North Carolina Booklet" published July 1911, translated the name "Pamall(?) Nail"
** I can't tell myself, either Jas or Sam. would work. "Pamall" is certainly not corect, but it could be a badly rendered "Samuell." In fact, I think that's what it has to be;


!CENSUS:1790 Iredell Co., NC
p. 390 Andrew Nail 1-0-1-0-5
p. 391 Gilbreath Nail 2-6-2-0-2
p. 391 Samuel Nail 1-0-1-0-0 <---
p. 391 William Nail 2-1-4-0-0
p. 391 Robert Nail 1-1-3-0-0
p. 391 James Nail 2-0-1-0-0
p. 391 James Nail Junr 1-0-3-0-0;


!CENSUS:1800 Iredell Co., NC
p. 651 Andrew Neal 01001-01001-0-6 age 45+ (bef 1755)
p. 651 Margaret Neal 21000-21010-0-0 age 26-44 (1755/1774)
p. 651 William Neal 00301-10101-0-0 age 45+ (bef 1755)
p. 651 Samuel Neil 00012-00000-0-0 age 45+ (bef 1755) <---
above grouped together in alpha list
p. 675 Gelbreath Neal 22311-00101-0-1 age 45+ (bef 1755);


!TAXLIST:1800 Iredell Co., NC
Samuel Neil, 200 acres, one barn
Andrew Neil Senr 1138 acres, one barn 50 x 20, one still house
Willian Neil, 348 acres, one barn & stable
Robert Neil, 398 acres, one stable
Gilbreath Neil, 798 acres, one barn 36 x 16 & stable, one mill;


!DEED:13 Nov 1802 Iredell Co., NC Deed Book E, p. 71
Samuel Niel of Iredell to John Hughs of same
40 pounds
Waters of Halls Creek ... James Pattersons line ... 52 acres
includes improvements made by Joseph Christy and by him sold to said John Hughs
S: Saml Neil (his mark)
W: David Ramsey, Patrick Grahams
* Note: John Hughs sold this same land to Samuel Brooks Senr on 2 Feb 1808;


!DEED:-- --- 1807 Iredell Co., NC Deed Book M, pp. 699-701
Samuel Neil of Iredell to Christohper Hughes
$394
Waters of Neils Creek 197 acres
S: Samuel Neil
W: Gilbraith Neil, Robert Cavin, John Hughs
Reg. 22 Jul 1827;


!CENSUS:1810 x
* Bourbon co., KY p. 198 Samuel Neal 10100-00100-0-0 too young
* Jefferson Co., KY p. 537 Saml Neel 00211-10201-0-11
* Ohio Co., KY p. 474 Samuel Neal 01010-31010-0-0 too young
* Wayne Co., KY p. 369 Saml Neal 20001-12200-0-0
* Mecklenburg Co., NC p. 464 Saml Neil 31120-10010-0-7 (1755/1774) too young
* Laurens Dist., SC p. 316 Samuel Neal 22010-10210-0-0 too young
* Pendleton Dist., SC p. 215 Saml Neele 01101-01001-0-1 right age, but not him. Died 1811. Wife Rebecca. 		Neill, Samuel (I126660)
 
84619 !NOTES:This person is *possibly* my 7x Great Uncle;


!REFERENCE:
https://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/naill/default.html


!COURT:16 Jan 1760 Rowan Co., NC
The Will of George Davidson decd proven in court by John Neal ...


!WITNESS-DEED: 1 Jan 1765 Rowan Co., NC Deed Book 6, p. 76
William Neell & wife Mary to Gilbraith Falls,
566 acres on north side of Cataba River & Lambeth's Mill Creek adj John McDowell & William Hall
S: William Neill, Mary Neill (her mark)
W: George Clayton, John Neill


!CENSUS:1790 x 		Neill, John (I126732)
 
84620 !NOTES:This person is *possibly* my 7x Great Uncle;


!REFERENCE:
https://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/naill/default.html


!COURT:20 DEC 1753 Rowan Co., NC
Motion made by James Neill through his council that the time his servant had absented himself may be allowed him and also the money Disbursed by him in Ordr. to procure his sd servt ...;


!MARRIAGE BOND:11 Aug 1759 Rowan Co., NC
James Neil & Ann Snoddy
William Neill, bm;


!NAMED-MARRIAGE BOND: 4 Mar 1772 Rowan Co., NC
James Holmes and Mary Nail, d/o James
William Bell, bm;


!CENSUS:1790 Iredell Co., NC
p. 390 Andrew Nail 1-0-1-0-5
p. 391 Gilbreath Nail 2-6-2-0-2
p. 391 Samuel Nail 1-0-1-0-0
p. 391 William Nail 2-1-4-0-0
p. 391 Robert Nail 1-1-3-0-0
p. 391 James Nail 2-0-1-0-0 <---
p. 391 James Nail Junr 1-0-3-0-0;


!WILL:22 Jun 1793 Iredell Co., NC James Neill
dau Sarah
dau Hannah
son William
unto James Holmes my son-in-law
each of the heirs of my daughter Mary now deceased
son Archabald
son James
dau Elizabeth
son Robert
land joining Samuel Neill, Andrew Ramsey & James Patterson
my beloved wife (not named)
my wife and son Robert my executors
S: James Neill (his mark)
W: James Keer, John Falls; 		Neill, James (I126666)
 
84621 !NOTES:This person is *possibly* my 7x Great Uncle;


!REFERENCE:
https://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/naill/default.html


!DEED: 4 Apr 1761 Rowan Co., NC Deed Book 4, pp. 557-558
John Earl Granville to Andrew Neil of Rowan Co., NC
467 acres Parish of St. Luke Middle Fork of Lamberts Mill Creek, east side of Cataubo River joining William Neil on his east and est lines ...


!BONDSMAN-MARRIAGE BOND: 3 Nov 1774 Rowan Co., NC
Andrew Kerr & Jean Neal
Andrew Neill, bm;


!BONDSMAN-MARRIAGE BOND:28 Oct 1779 Rowan Co., NC
William Kerr & Rosanna Neal
Andrew Neill, bm;


!CENSUS:1790 Iredell Co., NC
p. 390 Andrew Nail 1-0-1-0-5 <---
p. 391 Gilbreath Nail 2-6-2-0-2
p. 391 Samuel Nail 1-0-1-0-0
p. 391 William Nail 2-1-4-0-0
p. 391 Robert Nail 1-1-3-0-0
p. 391 James Nail 2-0-1-0-0
p. 391 James Nail Junr 1-0-3-0-0;


!CENSUS:1800 Iredell Co., NC
p. 651 Andrew Neal 01001-01001-0-6 age 45+ (bef 1755) <---
p. 651 Margaret Neal 21000-21010-0-0 age 26-44 (1755/1774)
p. 651 William Neal 00301-10101-0-0 age 45+ (bef 1755)
p. 651 Samuel Neil 00012-00000-0-0 age 45+ (bef 1755)
above grouped together in alpha list
p. 675 Gelbreath Neal 22311-00101-0-1 age 45+ (bef 1755);


!TAXLIST:1800 Iredell Co., NC
Samuel Neil, 200 acres, one barn
Andrew Neil Senr 1138 acres, one barn 50 x 20, one still house
Willian Neil, 348 acres, one barn & stable
Robert Neil, 398 acres, one stable
Gilbreath Neil, 798 acres, one barn 36 x 16 & stable, one mill;


!WILL:15 Feb 1808 Iredell Co., NC Andrew Neill
son Wm Neill the plantation where he now lives in Lincoln County
my dau Sarah Falls
son Gilbreath Neill
son Gilbreath's sons exepting his son Jon. Neill
my grandson John. Neill who now lives with me
grandson Andrew Neill son of Gilbreath
gr-dau Rosanna Allison that lives with me ...
dau Jean Ker
dau Easther Donnelson
sons Gilbreath and William my executors
S: Andrew Neill
W: David Houston, Andw Ramsey, Robert (illeg)
No probate date;


!CENSUS:1810 Iredell Co., NC p. 148
Andrew Neil age 45+ (bef 1765)
00001-00000-0-5 		Neill, Andrew (I126661)
 
84622 !NOTES:This person is *possibly* my 7x Great Uncle;


!REFERENCE:
https://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/naill/default.html


!NAMED-LAND ENTRY:25 Sep 1779 Rowan Co., NC
Gilbreath Falls enters 90 acres (# 2318) waters of Lamberths Creek joining
Arthur Travers, William Erwin, Alexander Neil & his own lines;


!COURT: 3 May 1785 Rowan Co., NC Court Minutes 1753-1795
"Administration on the personal estate of Alexander Neil deceased is ordered to issue to Elizabeth Neil the widow of said deceased who qualified and gave bond with Lambert Clayton & Robert Smith security ...; 		Neill, Alexander (I126720)
 
84623 !NOTES:This person is *possibly* my 7x Great Uncle;


!REFERENCE:
https://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/naill/default.html


!NOTES:Family well outlined in court case Neill vs. Cathey:
https://martygrant.com/genealogy/cathey/cathey-george-1735-1790-burke-neill-vs-cathey-1823.html


!DEED:20 & 21 Nov 1754 Rowan Co., NC Deed Book 2, pp. 278-281
John McDowell of Anson to William Neill of Rowan
640 acres Fork of McDowells Creek a branch of Catawbo River
S: John McDowell
W: Andrew Barry, Andw Alison, Hugh McCracken;


!DEED:28 Jan 1758 Rowan Co., NC Deed Book 2, pp. 266-269
(Lease) John McCullogh of Rowan for Lord Granville to William Neill of Rowan
566 acres ... later says 500 acres for 5 shillings
(Release) 29 Jan 1758
same to same for sum of (blank)
566 acres
no waterway or other geographic landmarks mentioned.


!BONDSMAN-MARRIAGE BOND:11 Aug 1759 Rowan Co., NC
James Neil & Ann Snoddy
William Neill, bm;


!DEED: 1 Jan 1765 Rowan Co., NC Deed Book 6, p. 76
William Neell & wife Mary to Gilbraith Falls,
566 acres on north side of Cataba River & Lambeth's Mill Creek adj John McDowell & William Hall
S: William Neill, Mary Neill (her mark)
W: George Clayton, John Neill


!DEED:11 Oct 1779 Rowan Co., NC Deed Book 9, p. 88
William Neill of Burke Co., NC to Galbreath Falls of Rowan
100a north fork of Lamboths Creek ... ;


!BONDSMAN-MARRIAGE BOND:13 Aug 1788 Rowan Co., NC
James Neill & Sarah Neal
William Neill, bm;


!CENSUS:1790 Burke Co., NC 1st Company
p. 88 Wm Neall age 16+ (bef 1774) 4-1-4-0-0
p. 88 Jas. Neall age 16+ (bef 1774) 1-4-2-0-1
p. 88 Andw. Neall age 16+ (bef 1774) 1-1-4-0-0
p. 103 Arche Neall age 16+ (bef 1774) 2-0-4-0-0;


!ESTATE:24 Apr 1800 Burke Co., NC William Neill decd
Inventory returned by Samuel and Gilbreath Neill, Executors
Three legatees (not named);


!CENSUS:1800 x
Died 1797. 		Neill, Cpt William (I51735)
 
84624 !NOTES:This person is *possibly* my 8x Great Grandfather;


!REFERENCE:
https://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/naill/default.html


!COURT: Sep 1766 Rowan Co., NC Court Minutes 1753-1772 p. 626
Ordered that Sarah Neal have letters of Admr. of all and singular ??? goods of William Neal decd ...
Security Alexr. Martin & Thos Neal


!ESTATATE:1770 Rowan Co., NC William Neill
15 Feb 1770 Bond
Sarah Neil, Executrix of Wm Neil decd 		Neill, William (I126664)
 
84625 !NOTES:This person is *possibly* my 8x Great Grandmother;


!REFERENCE:
https://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/naill/default.html


!NOTES:Online trees have her as Sarah Falls b 21 Jun 1711 Claire, Down, Ireland
died 14 Oct 1766. Proof of any of that?
Others have her as Sarah Callander, b Jun 1704. Any proof of that maiden name or birth date?


!COURT: Sep 1766 Rowan Co., NC Court Minutes 1753-1772 p. 626
Ordered that Sarah Neal have letters of Admr. of all and singular ??? goods of William Neal decd ...
Security Alexr. Martin & Thos Neal


!ESTATATE:1770 Rowan Co., NC William Neill
15 Feb 1770 Bond
Sarah Neil, Executrix of Wm Neil decd 		Callander, Sarah (I126663)
 
84626 !NOTES:This person is a place holder to keep together several related (or potentially related) Stewarts who had roots in Surry Co., NC; Stewart (I5685)
 
84627 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several potentially related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown.

Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships (or lack thereof) can be determined.; 		Johnson (I34198)
 
84628 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not.


!NOTES:I (Marty Grant) am not a Moody descendant but I am interested in the Marion County, SC Moodys due to numerous intermarriages into my own families; 		Moody (I106713)
 
84629 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships (or lack thereof) can be determined.;


!REFERENCE:
http://www.martygrant.com/
http://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/james/ 		James (I107558)
 
84630 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships (or lack thereof) can be determined.;


!REFERENCE:
http://www.martygrant.com/
http://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/james/ 		James (I107561)
 
84631 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships (or lack thereof) can be determined.;


!REFERENCE:
http://www.martygrant.com/
http://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/roberts/NC-SC/ 		Roberts (I101429)
 
84632 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships (or lack thereof) can be determined.;


!REFERENCE:
http://www.martygrant.com/
http://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/roberts/NC-SC/ 		Roberts (I107292)
 
84633 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships (or lack thereof) can be determined.;


!REFERENCE:
http://www.martygrant.com/ 		Ammons (I108585)
 
84634 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships (or lack thereof) can be determined.;


!REFERENCE:
http://www.martygrant.com/ 		? (I108586)
 
84635 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships (or lack thereof) can be determined.;

!NOTES:Grants of Marlboro Co., SC. 		Grant (I107685)
 
84636 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships can be determined.

* Benjamin H. Henslee & William O. Henslee were about the same age, both born in NC, both went to Greene, later Webster Co., MO, and were next door neighbors in 1880. This doesn't prove they are brothers, but strongly suggests it, or at least some sort of close relationship.; 		Henslee (I12770)
 
84637 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships can be determined.

* This person is primarily to tie together several Burke County, North Carolina Davis famiiles, not old enough to be part of the previous generation, but perhaps children of one or more of those in the first generation. There is little or no proof that any of the children listed are actually related to one another, but I do want to keep them together pending more information being found.; 		Davis (I101824)
 
84638 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships can be determined.

* This person is primarily to tie together very early Burke County, North Carolina Davis famiiles. There is little or no proof that any of the children listed are actually related to one another, but I do want to keep them together pending more information being found.; 		Davis (I36245)
 
84639 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships can be determined.
* All of these lived in Ashe Co., NC in 1800. I have no idea if they were closely related to one another, or even related at all.; 		Davis (I31598)
 
84640 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships can be determined.;


!NOTES:Isaac Davis (c1822) and Samuel (c1824) were living together in 1850. Presumably brothers.;


!REFERENCE:
http://www.martygrant.com/
http://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/davis/ 		Davis (I103422)
 
84641 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships can be determined.;


!NOTES:Libo Davis and William L. Davis were living together in 1850. They may be brothers, or closely related in some other way.;


!REFERENCE:
http://www.martygrant.com/
http://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/davis/ 		Davis (I91362)
 
84642 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships can be determined.;


!NOTES:Three of these Davises married sisters and were associated with each other, so if not brothers they are closely related in some other way. Nelson Davis was neighbor to Charles in 1850, and returned to Haywood after that.;


!REFERENCE:
http://www.martygrant.com/
http://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/davis/ 		Davis (I103411)
 
84643 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships can be determined.;


!REFERENCE:
http://www.martygrant.com/ 		Davis (I107033)
 
84644 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships can be determined.;


* Labon Baker and Elizabeth Baker Burchfield were next door neighbors in 1860. Doesn't prove they are siblings, but suggests it, or other close relationship.;


!REFERENCE:
http://www.martygrant.com/
http://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/baker/ 		Baker (I104563)
 
84645 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships can be determined.; Hamilton (I17049)
 
84646 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships can be determined.; Dozier (I106898)
 
84647 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not. In fact some probably can't be siblings due to having the same names, or huge differences in age. However, like I stated, this is only to link them together as an extended family unit, until their precise relationships can be determined.; Godfrey (I107040)
 
84648 !NOTES:This person is a place-holder used to connect several related people together, though their exact relationship to each other is unknown. Being listed as a child of this person makes them appear to be siblings, but it is not certain if that is the case or not.;


!NOTES:Amos (95525), John (95527) and Dempsey (94804) all appear to be related to one another. John and Amos were adjoining land owners, and Dempsey had land that bordered William King, who in turn had land bordering Amos Grant.

John and Dempsey also had Jonathan Kittrell in common via several deeds.; 		Grant (I95339)
 
84649 !NOTES:This person is a placeholder for Strouds in Granville Co., NC who are otherwise unidentified.; Stroud (I108120)
 
84650 !NOTES:This person is a placeholder for various Madison Co., TN and Dyer Co., TN Edwards that were neighbors or associated with my Barnabas Edwards. Probably not related to him or each other, but I wanted to keep them together for quick reference; Edwards (I123019)
 

      «Prev «1 ... 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 ... 1769» Next»

This site powered by The Next Generation of Genealogy Sitebuilding v. 15.0.5, written by Darrin Lythgoe © 2001-2026.

Maintained by Marty Grant. | Data Protection Policy.